The new consumer journey

A while back, I attempted to create a model the way companies need to leverage new marketing to engage today’s consumers. I looked at a number of interesting approaches, but in the end opted to build around the idea of a marketing spiral.  I’m sure there are a number of other ways to illustrate the consumer journey other than using a spiral, but this is what I came up with. If anybody wants to take another stab at this, please do and let me know where you post it. Read on to discover how you can use this model to define your new marketing program.

Today’s consumers start with an Initial Considersation Set. Martin Lindstrom’s brain scan research in his groundbreaking book, “Buyology,” clearly shows that we all have an initial consideration set for every product category, many of which are completely unconscious. We choose a brand of shampoo simply because we are used to choosing it, or because on some unconscious level, our gut tells us that it’s better than the others for any number of reasons which we spend less than a few seconds consciously thinking about.

“It’s natural.” “It has a secret formula.” “It’s scientifically proven.” “I like the way it smells.” “It makes my hair feel nice.” “It’s cheap.” All these statements and a near infinite variety of others, which are completely personal to each individual, contribute to our initial consideration set.

Martin Lindstrom’s research also reveals that changing these ‘consideration sets’ is harder than it looks. In some cases, it even requires truly radical events. It took a global recession to turn affluent middle class shoppers into price savvy buyers. It took an end-of-the-world scenario involving climate change to get people to start considering carbon footprints when looking to buy a new car.

Advertisers historically have used creative disruption as a way to “open our minds” to another possible consideration set. For decades toothpaste that cleaned the teeth and kept them healthy was enough for us. Suddenly however, advertisers have effectively convinced us that we actually want toothpaste that doesn’t just clean, but makes them white, because we all know, white teeth are healthy teeth. The same consideration set has now been given a qualifier, healthy teeth = white teeth, so I need whitening toothpaste.

On the Internet, transparency means that marketers have to think and behave differently, because people can quite simply use Google to research a product to find out if it actually makes our teeth white, or even if white teeth are healthy teeth. Which is why where Affinity comes to play. Affinity is about building emotional connections between brand and consumer. To build affinity in today’s online world, marketers leverage social media strategies targeted around Influence and Advocacy.

Although common social media lore is that some people are better influencers than other, BzzAgents in the US has found that anybody can be an influencer. An influencer happens to be somebody you know or meet who says the right thing at the right time. You might happen across somebody on a train who is reading a book that looks interesting because a) they are laughing their head off and b) you are bored stiff reading the same old celebrity trash in the Metro. So you might think, “if I had that book, I wouldn’t have to read this lousy newspaper.” This is precisely the experience BzzAgent discovered when it sent out its agents to promote some of the latest reads. At the end of the day, building an emotional bond with consumers is all about trust. And that trust starts more often than not, through somebody else.

As we continue down the crazy funnel of consumerist choice, we move towards having Conversations. Back on our train, you’re likely start up a conversation with the book reader. “So is that a good book?” You might ask, though the roaring laughter would probably be a dead giveaway. In more structured mechanisms, brands can create opportunities for conversation using Presence & Participation, by participating in or even hosting conversations on their own blogs and in existing blogs, review sites and forums. These conversations can have a massive benefit. Your consumers get to talk to real people who speak like real people, not like an aggressive PR agent on a mission or a call centre in Bombay.

The next step in journey is to facilitate their Participation with your brand by creating Visibility & Distribution. This is achieved with seeding content and leveraging advertorial placements, content partnerships, relevant sponsorships and other forms of content generation around the brand. The key is to think like Coca-Cola. “Be everywhere the customer is thirsty.”

Use social listening to map out all of the places people are looking for content about your brand, and ensure your content is there. Going back to our toothpaste example, our toothplace marketer should find everyplace online where people might be looking for information on ‘clean and white teeth,’ then make sure they have positioned the right content to help consumers in their research.

The Engagement step is crucial. Even if the consumer walks away believing everything they heard about your brand and product, they will do more research and participate in further conversations or interactions with the brand. In fact, the higher the cost or level of complexity the product or service is, the more research consumers do.

So once you have seeded loads of content across the Internet, you need to make it easy for people to search and find it. Discovery & Search of content is so important that brands who get it spend disproportionate amounts of their budgets on search engine performance and optimization. Keyword optimization, social topic and taxonomy analysis, content submission to multiple social sharing sites, the use of rich metadata on content and content linking are all techniques that can be employed to make it easy for people to find and engage with your content.

To ensure that the content does what it needs to, i.e. convince the consumer that you have the best toothpaste for instance, it’s best to leverage the consumer’s voice as much as possible and target against consumer passions (fashion, music, film, whatever). The more relevant you can be, the more focused your message is to your audience, the more likely you will be included in their final consideration set.

In other words, if you can get a hundred ordinary people to test, record and talk about your toothpaste versus other brands, the more likely people will add it to their brand list. To ensure credibility, it’s best to foster conversations not just on your site, but on trusted forums and communities that editorially make sense for your brand.

After all of this interaction with you, your content, other customers, our buzz agents and the average guy or girl on the street, the consumer finally buys your product. Great! Job well done! On to the next one. Right? Wrong!

Winning a consumer is only the first round. Imagine what will happen if the consumer’s experience with your brand is completely not what he/she expected, or worse, is just plain awful. That disappointed consumer will write about those awful brand experiences. Other customers will jump on the brand-bashing bandwagon and the individual and collective experiences will get shared to every living person they can reach ensuring your brand is not on anybody else’s initial consideration set.

Sadly, bad reviews outnumber good reviews in just about every category. This is basic psychology really. People who feel cheated want justice. Because they are unlikely to get their money back, they will enact justice by trying to prevent others from making the same mistake. So they become detractors. Detractors can destroy a brand’s reputation online, which is why it’s important to make sure the product experience lives up to the hype. The good news however, is that detractors can be won over surprisingly easily. It often just takes a brand that is willing to listen honestly and is sincerely willing to try to do better.

Most agencies recommend social listening however as a way to find out want people are really saying about your brand, and observing as away to learn how they use your products; all with the goal of tackling negative word of mouth and to improve their marketing to consumers. The general problem with this advice is that the real reason to listen to word of mouth is not to rush into a PR campaign whenever you hear harsh criticisms, but to collect ongoing feedback and communicate these as insights to the product teams with the mandate of making better products and services. That’s the message you want to communicate. “Sorry, we listened. We are making it better.”

Naturally, if you have a great product, your toothpaste makes teeth brilliantly white, your book is a brilliant piece of literature, then social listening will give you the genuine testimonials of real consumers. Best of all, they’ll be testimonials delivered not necessarily by you, because let’s face it, how many people trust testimonials by marketers, but rather by consumers directly to consumers. All you had to do was make sure that a) you have a good product and service and b) you are in the right places having the right conversations and supplying the kind of content people need to understand and believe in your product.

There was an important and potentially market changing report released by IBM last year called ”Attaining Sustainable Growth Through Corporate Social Responsibility,” that the sustainability lobby and bloggers picked up, but marketing bloggers seems to have ignored. So here is the video on it for those who missed it.

Now, there is likely to be a belief that because of the recession, we can throw out all of this information. We can unwind our CSR efforts. Finally go back to massive cost cutting and focus on the bottom line by continuing to do business in the way we once used to, without having to worry about ethics. When it comes to the recession, ethics fly out the door. Or does it?

Consider the massive consumer and even governmental back-lash against the massively unethical behavior of the banks that threw the world economy into a tailspin. Governments are calling for more regulation and an end to runaway capitalism. While consumers are calling for a return to the old-days when bankers were trusted members of the community and knew their individual customers. Take a look at the latest Natwest campaigns on YouTube to see where that industry is headed. 

The fact is, we are entering an age where CSR will be what keeps a brand from tanking in the post-recession world. So though marketers and CEO’s might be inclined to shelve their CSR plans (for now), they may want to think twice and start using the recession as the reason to re-engineer their marketing departments and their business.

Here are four ways for companies to rethink the way they approach marketing in order to ensure coming out of the recession ahead of the competition.

Re-thinking corporate marketing

The most worrying statistic in IBM’s report is that 76% of surveyed business leaders don’t know their customer’s CSR expectations. Read another way, one could almost say that these business leaders don’t really understand their customers at all. They may have insights into the consumer’s purchasing patterns, but they don’t really know what makes them choose one product over another, let alone what they really think concerning ethical behaviour. For marketers to really understand today’s consumer market, there are some fundamental marketing behaviours that need to change.

First, marketers should no longer attempt to classify and pigeonhole customers into artificial segmentation models. These are old-fashioned research methods that belong in a previous age and should be left behind. Marketers need to recognise and identify people as individuals, each with their own unique needs and desires. Against popular perception, powerful privacy busting databases are not needed to do this. One simply has to be in a position to ask them to share the information, or better yet, to empower them with better ways to control and share their own data.
 
Second, marketers should stop thinking in terms of persuasion, selling and manipulation. Marketers have been waging psychological warfare against their customers for decades, and many still continue to do so. Armed with the latest psycho-babble from their ad agencies, they rush out to attack the individual’s sense of purpose, family, confidence, self image and integrity and to supplant it with a belief that shopping cures all ills.
 
Not content with brainwashing adults, many marketers are even falling into the legal and ethical landmine that is marketing to children, in the belief that brainwashing a future generation of consumers will ensure long-term growth. In truth, they are merely opening themselves up to an extremely litigious future, when parents of these children start class action suits against these companies for violating parental rights. The law may appear to insulate today, but laws change as quickly as the politicians who push them through. And what is legal today, necessarily won’t be tomorrow.

Third, marketers and CEO’s both need to stop thinking CSR as a public relations department or a new form of marketing opportunity. As Benetton and Marks & Spencer have learned, there is massive business growth for companies who embrace CSR, not as a new product division, or even as a communications platform, but rather as core business practice, one that runs horizontally and vertically through the organisation. One only needs to look at the runaway success of companies such as CaféDirect, Innocent Drinks, Body Shop, FairTrade labelled products and many other new players, to realise where the consumers’ money is going to be spent. These ethically focused companies will dominate the 21st century post-recession landscape.

Even the term marketing itself is out of date. A new term should be coined to more accurately describe what these departments need to do. Perhaps Customer Partnership Manager or Community Engager would be more accurate titles.

Fourth, marketers need to be empowered by CEOs to focus on delivering results annually or even bi-annually rather than quarterly. And their benchmarks shouldn’t solely be focused on sales returns. By changing the measurements for marketers, CEO’s can empower their front-line to think and act strategically over the long-term, rather than tactically over the short term.

Concepts such as, ‘the lifetime environmental and social costs of a product or service’ need to be part of the marketer’s daily vocabulary. They need to be able to think about softer but critical issues such as ‘consumer confidence’ and ‘trust’ over profit margins. The current trend of overcharging for ethical and organic products on the premise that customers will be gladly pay extra for a clean conscience is happening because marketers still prioritise their commercial imperative to endlessly increase profit. The real cost of this bi-polar thinking is a growing damage to brand reputation.

For example, there is growing resentment among consumers who buy high-priced organic products that they are being ripped off in a land grab by opportunistic supermarkets. So as one hand of a supermarket brand is trying to create a sustainable and ethical reputation by committing to FairTrade, organic and local sourcing standards, their other hand is seen as robbing customers blind. 

There is a way forward, but one which will be a bitter medicine to swallow for today’s profit obsessed marketers and CEO’s. That medicine is called total transparency, and it requires a great deal of trust and faith between the corporation and the consumer. That trust and faith can be developed at low cost using the Internet.

In the last decade, the world as we know it underwent a fundamental change. A change so profound that it represented an extinction-level event for businesses of all types. Science defines an extinction-level event (or ELE to film buffs) as a period in time when a large number of species die out. The most famous ELE event, the extinction of the dinosaurs, is contributed to an asteroid impact.

The asteroid that collided with the business world on August 6, 1991 was the Internet, or more precisely, the World Wide Web. And its impact is still being felt globally. The resulting impact of the Internet is suffocating any businesses incapable of making evolutionary changes, while literally wiping out some businesses altogether. Any business that hasn’t already adapted to the new way the world works is already under threat. This includes those working in the middle, those who’s business models rely on corporate secrecy and those who still cling to the notion of branded air.

If you work in the middle, the air probably is already starting to feel a bit thin. This is especially true in the entertainment industry. As the Internet enables content producers and creators, to publish, market and distribute their products directly to consumers, then what role is there for distributors, marketers and packagers? In fact, do we really need any middlemen in the entertainment business? Consumers are quite happy with the notion of “free.” And if pressed, would much rather pay the artists directly.  

Business who rely on corporate secrecy to maintain their existence are finding that secrets have a way of being exposed. With the likes of sites such as Wikileaks.org, Corporate Watch (corpwatch.org) , Source Watch (sourcewatch.org) and Whatdotheyknow.com, corporate secrecy is approaching its own end of days. Whistleblowers are being praised as the our new heroes and leaking sensitive documents is quickly becoming a fad in its own right. For after decades of being fired, laid-off, made redundant and generally used as disposable assets, consumers are today loyal unto themselves, not to corporations and are quite happy to expose the corporate dirty laundry.

Even the seemingly harmless brands are becoming increasingly under the microscope of global consumer eye. Fast moving consumer goods, fashion brands, banks and service brands of all kinds are seeing the flip-side of globalization, global awareness and knowledge. Shady business practices in far-flung corners of the planet are being dished up in the headlines of Western papers and books for all to see as remote bloggers track the daily lives of near-slave labourers in Southeast Asian countries. In the light of global awareness, creating brand meanings out of thin air is seen for what it really is, air. 

So unless you have been living on another planet while the ELE happened, then you probably already know all of this. You probably have read the recommended books that tell you how exactly your business must change. Or listened to a dozen overpriced consultants telling you what you already felt in your gut. The air is not getting thin. It is thin! The oxygen is nearly gone. Your consumers are fleeing in droves or fighting back. 

There is no real secret here. Consumers do what consumers have always done. They try to get what they want. It’s up to marketers to respond to the consumer, not vice versa. It’s time to add value to the equation to the extent that consumers not only want to engage with you, but want to help you as well.

This blog will show you practical strategies to make your business relevant again to a growing consumer base that, at present, couldn’t really be bothered with you. A word of caution however. It doesn’t mean that you can keep doing business as usual. You will need to redefine your role in the entertainment equation. You will need to find a way to become relevant and useful to an audience that is godlike in their dissemination of media and entertainment.